Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3960X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4438 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Core i7-3960X
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - €129.91 vs €630.75
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900F - €0.83 vs €3.22 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 25% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-3960X - 196 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3960X - 32 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
157
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 444 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.22/FPS
26%
Price, €
€630.75
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €630.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 444 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3960X | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |