Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Core i7-3770K
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €127.95 vs €571.15
- Up to 75% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-13900F - €0.51 vs €2.04 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-3770K - 280 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 32 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
251
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€127.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €127.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 383 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.04/FPS
25%
Price, €
€571.15
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €571.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 383 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K | vs | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |