Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 10 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600.
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €201.20 vs €495.99
- Up to 59% better value when playing New World than Core i9-13900F - €1.32 vs €3.24 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €495.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€201.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €201.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900F | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |