Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-12700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-12700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 651 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-12700F.
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €299.83 vs €471.07
- Up to 33% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-14900K - €2.29 vs €3.41 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-12700F - 138 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
131
95%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€299.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €299.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.41/FPS
67%
Price, €
€471.07
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-12700F | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |