Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-12700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-12700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-12700F.
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €299.63 vs €480.04
- Up to 33% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-13900KF - €1.10 vs €1.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-12700F - 294 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 32 vs 20 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
272
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€299.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €299.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 952 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
294
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
67%
Price, €
€480.04
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €480.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 952 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-12700F | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |