The Core i7-10700F is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 5800 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €114.58 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
The Ryzen 7 5800 is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 5800
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 36% cheaper – €203.99 vs €318.57
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 7 5800 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
191
96%
Min 1% FPS
126
95%
Price, €
€318.57
64%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
61%
Ryzen 7 5800
Jan 12th, 2021
Average FPS
200
100%
Min 1% FPS
132
100%
Price, €
€203.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 7 5800 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 7 5800 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 7 5800 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Ryzen 7 5800
Jan 12th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-10700F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 5800 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |