Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1457 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Core i5-9400F
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €208.62 vs €719.98
- Up to 62% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €1.15 vs €2.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 32% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-9400F - 241 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
182
76%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €208.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7324 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
241
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.99/FPS
38%
Price, €
€719.98
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7598 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400F | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |