Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4747 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Core i5-2500
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - €225.08 vs €367.22
- Up to 27% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-14700F - €1.09 vs €1.50 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 18% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-2500 - 244 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 28 vs 4 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
207
85%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€225.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €225.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1246 minutes ago
Buy for €367.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1245 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2500 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |