Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €137.78 vs €690.00
- Up to 77% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €1.14 vs €4.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-9100F - 139 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
121
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€137.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €137.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Buy for €690 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100F | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |