Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4238 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Core i3-3110M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i3-3110M - 275 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 28 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
275
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€378.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €378.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 296 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3110M | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |