In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-3110M is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $245 cheaper!
Core i3-3110M
- Up to 78% cheaper – $69.95 vs $314.99
- Up to 78% cheaper
- Up to 53% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.14 vs $2.42/FPS
- Up to 53% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X
- Up to 113% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 113% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3110M vs Ryzen 9 7900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
47%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
47%
Price, $
$69.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$314.99
22%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
47%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3110M vs Ryzen 9 7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3110M vs Ryzen 9 7900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3110M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
