Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 713 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - €81.33 vs €609.79
- Up to 83% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-14900 - €0.35 vs €2.12 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 24% better in War Thunder than Core i3-12100F - 288 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
233
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Buy for €609.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-12100F | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
58 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |