Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 189 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Core i3-10320
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - €99.00 vs €126.11
- Up to 15% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 5600X - €0.56 vs €0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-10320 - 191 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Buy for €126.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |