Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 298 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i3-10320 - 204 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €85.00 vs €99.00
- Up to 14% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-10320 - €0.42 vs €0.49 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |