The Core i3-10320 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Athlon 3000G, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's €86.07 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-10320
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Athlon 3000G
- Up to 54% cheaper – €74.00 vs €160.07
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Core i3-10320 vs Athlon 3000G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, €
€160.07
46%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
49%
Core i3-10320 vs Athlon 3000G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10320 vs Athlon 3000G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10320 vs Athlon 3000G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Athlon 3000G
Nov 20th, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
