Buy on Amazon
€79.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP $699
Availability
MSRP $699
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - €79.90 vs €520.00
- Up to 79% better value when playing New World than Ryzen 9 7950X - €0.69 vs €3.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 39% better in New World than Core i3-10105F - 161 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
116
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel, processore desktop Core i3-10105F 10, di 10ᵃ generazione (frequenza di base: 3,7 GHz, turbo boost: 4,4 GHz, 4 core, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €79.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Amd Ryzen 9 7950X Processore, 16 Core/32 Thread Sfrenati, Architettura Zen 4, 80 Mb L3 Cache, Nero, 4 x 4 x 0.27 cm; 79.38 grammi
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
