Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 651 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - €72.54 vs €432.06
- Up to 83% better value when playing Control than Core i7-14700KF - €0.36 vs €2.08 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G6900 - 208 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 28 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
203
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7396 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
17%
Price, €
€432.06
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €432.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7396 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |