Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €72.54 vs €365.83
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-13700K - €0.54 vs €2.29 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G6900 - 160 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
24%
Price, €
€365.83
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €365.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |