Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Celeron G1840
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €79.99 vs €157.00
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 196% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1840 - 151 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 34% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1840 - €1.04 vs €1.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8837 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
50%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8837 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |