Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 2895 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Celeron G1840
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700 - €72.66 vs €158.77
- Up to 47% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 7 5700 - €0.23 vs €0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 17% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1840 - 372 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
319
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 337 minutes ago
Buy for €158.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 337 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |