Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - €29.90 vs €85.00
- Up to 61% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3600 - €0.27 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1820 - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
111
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€29.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €29.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7457 minutes ago
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7458 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |