Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 261 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-9900K - 182 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - €16.73 vs €85.00
- Up to 81% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 3600 - €0.09 vs €0.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
179
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €16.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |