The Celeron G1610 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-8400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-8400
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 2 threads
Celeron G1610 vs Core i5-8400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
166
90%
Min 1% FPS
112
91%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-8400
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
€68.59
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Celeron G1610 vs Core i5-8400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i5-8400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i5-8400 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-8400
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G1610 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-8400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $182.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 9 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
