Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2407 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - €28.50 vs €85.00
- Up to 61% better value when playing Watch Dogs: Legion than Ryzen 5 3600 - €0.23 vs €0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 17% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron G1610 - 145 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
124
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €28.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 314 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |