The Celeron 847 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 2 threads
Celeron 847 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Average FPS
161
84%
Min 1% FPS
109
87%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Jul 21st, 2020
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, €
€366.85
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Celeron 847 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
31%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Jul 21st, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 847 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Renoir |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |