Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3636 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Celeron 1037U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 22% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron 1037U - 383 vs 313 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 16 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
383
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1037U | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |