Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 3110 days newer than Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4130T - 119 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
98
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13278 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Chagall | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |