Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 75 days newer than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10400F - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
86.8882175226586%
Multi-Core
5751
39.44715001028877%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |