Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2966 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 21% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-4100 - 147 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 95 vs 280 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
121
82.31292517006803%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6355 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |