Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2405 days newer than Core i5-2400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Halo Infinite than Core i5-2400 - 158 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
