Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 44% better in Minecraft than FX-6300 - 862 vs 600 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €49.68 vs €690.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.08 vs €0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €690 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |