Buy on Amazon
€314
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2935 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 100% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6300 - 474 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €49.68 vs €314.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 5950X - €0.21 vs €0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD Processore Ryzen 9 5950X (16 C/32 T, 72 MB di cache, boost massimo fino a 4,9 GHz)
Buy for €314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
LANCHY AMD FX-Series FX-6300 CPU Processore Desktop 6-Core 6-Thread Usato 3,5 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 9 5950X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
| Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
