Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3585 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 31% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1620 - 415 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 55 vs 170 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
415
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€520
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
170 W | TDP | 55 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |