Buy on Amazon
€179.8
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $179
Availability
MSRP in USD: $179
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3409 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 6% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G1620 - 189 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 7 5700
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€179.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Processore AMD Ryzen 7 5700 (8 Cores/16 Threads, 65W TDP, AM4 Socket, Cache 20MB, Boost di Frequenza fino a 4.6 GHz,dissipatore ad aria "Wraith prism Cooler")
Buy for €179.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 7 5700
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Not Available | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
