Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2380 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 14% better in God of War than Celeron G1840 - 186 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Celeron G1840
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €79.99 vs €314.00
- Up to 71% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 9 5950X - €0.49 vs €1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 464 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
163
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 463 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 53 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |