Buy on Amazon
€273.61
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3166 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 25% better in Valorant than Xeon E5-1620 - 870 vs 696 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 24 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 9 5900X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
870
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€273.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Processor, 12 Core/24 Thread, Boost di Frequenza fino a 4.8 GHz
Buy for €273.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1975 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 9 5900X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Vermeer | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Ryzen 9 5900X or Xeon E5-1620
Valorant, 1920 x 1080, High
568 FPS
€2.69/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Ryzen 9 5900X
12 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,529.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
