Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i5-13400F

Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i5-13400F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-13400F

2.5 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i5-13400F Logo
Intel® Core™ i5-13400F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core (6 P-core + 4 E-core) Cache 20 MB, fino a 4,6 GHz

Buy for 216 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-13400F

2.5 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i5-13400F Logo
Intel® Core™ i5-13400F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core (6 P-core + 4 E-core) Cache 20 MB, fino a 4,6 GHz

Buy for 216 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.

Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F

  • Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1620 - 131 vs 112 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Elden Ring.
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Xeon E5-1620 Logo
Xeon E5-1620

Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012


FPS

112

85%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i5-13400F Logo
Core i5-13400F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

131

100%

Value, €/FPS

€1.65/FPS

100%

Price, €

€216

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel® Core™ i5-13400F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core (6 P-core + 4 E-core) Cache 20 MB, fino a 4,6 GHz

Buy for 216 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Xeon E5-1620 Logo
Xeon E5-1620

Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012

Intel Core i5-13400F Logo
Core i5-13400F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-1620 Logo
Xeon E5-1620

Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012


Single-Core

600

26%

Multi-Core

2238

20%

Intel Core i5-13400F Logo
Core i5-13400F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2290

100%

Multi-Core

10745

100%

Intel Xeon E5-1620 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-1620

vs
Intel Core i5-13400F Logo

Intel Core i5-13400F

Mar 6th, 2012Release Date
Jan 4th, 2023
Xeon E5CollectionCore i5
Sandy Bridge-EPCodenameRaptor Lake
Intel Socket 2011SocketIntel Socket 1700
Server
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
10
8Threads
16
3.6 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.5 GHz
3.8 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz
130 WTDPNot Available
32 nmProcess Size
10 nm
36.0x
Multiplier25.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Xeon E5-1620 or Core i5-13400F

Elden Ring, 1920 x 1080, Maximum

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.