Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 54 days newer than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 9 4900HS - 219 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 20 vs 16 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |