Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 425 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G6900 - 217 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - €84.05 vs €165.37
- Up to 47% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 5800X - €0.4 vs €0.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €165.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €84.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |