Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 651 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Celeron G6900 - 169 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €78.7 vs €659.02
- Up to 87% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-14900K - €0.51 vs €3.9 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.9/FPS
13%
Price, €
€659.02
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €659.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
153
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |