Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3500 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 31% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3220 - 231 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Core i3-3220
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700 - €19.49 vs €158.77
- Up to 84% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 7 5700 - €0.11 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €158.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
177
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 5700 | vs | Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Not Available | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |