Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Core i3-3220
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €19.49 vs €157.00
- Up to 84% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13400F - €0.12 vs €0.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3220 - 206 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
169
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |