Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 435 days newer than Ryzen 7 4800HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 1% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Ryzen 7 4800HS - 122 vs 121 FPS
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |