Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 298 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-10400F - 125 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800X - €141.58 vs €290.43
- Up to 50% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 3800X - €1.16 vs €2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3242 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3242 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |