Buy on Amazon
€246.59
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 480 days newer than Ryzen 7 3750H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 26% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 7 3750H - 196 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3750H - 20 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€246.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel - Processore Core i9-10900F 10 Core 2,8 GHz Socket LGA 1200 Tray Senza Scatola
Buy for €246.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen 7 3750H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
