Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2498 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-3220 - 542 vs 506 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - €19.49 vs €153.21
- Up to 86% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 7 3700X - €0.04 vs €0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €153.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
506
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |