Buy on Amazon
€229.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 548 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Celeron G3900 - 173 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - €60.9 vs €229.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen 7 1700 - €0.36 vs €1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
27.06766917293233%
Price, €
€229.99
26%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - Processore 3.0 GHz (3.7 GHz Turbo) - Socket AM4
Buy for €229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
169
97.6878612716763%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
57.810945273631845%
Multi-Core
992
19.450980392156865%
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
