Buy on Amazon
€290.43
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1591 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8300 - 119 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - €80.56 vs €290.43
- Up to 69% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 7 1700 - €0.75 vs €2.44 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - Processore 3.0 GHz (3.7 GHz Turbo) - Socket AM4
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz a otto core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Pacchetto di massa FX-8300 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
