Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €80.56 vs €354.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €0.48 vs €1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8300 - 216 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Buy for €354 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |