Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 164 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 15 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U - 135 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U - 48 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Mobile • May 7th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
May 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Renoir | Codename | Castle Peak |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
